RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04221
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for two days of leave.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His squadrons support staff readjusted his days of leave while
he was on leave which resulted in him owing a debt. His
permissive and terminal leave were approved before his out-
processing and should not have been changed.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
31 May 89.
On 31 Aug 14, the applicant was furnished an honorable
discharge, and was credited with 20 years, 2 months, and 19 days
of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, the losing commander may approve up to
20 days of permissive temporary duty leave for Continental
United States (CONUS) based members. Permissive temporary duty
must occur within 180 days of the separation or retirement date,
and may be in conjunction with terminal leave. Terminal leave
is chargeable leave taken in conjunction with retirement or
separation from active duty.
Based on the evidence provided, they were unable to determine if
the support staff readjusted the dates of the applicants leave
while he was on leave. His leave history in the Master Military
Pay Account, dated 12 Nov 14, does not reflect any lost leave.
Additionally, the Finance Out-processing Checklist stated, at
the time, the applicant did not owe a debt as of 6 May 14.
However, the checklist also stated subsequent review or audit
of records may establish that you are indebted for an amount not
indicated on this list. Failure by the organizations to reflect
debt on this checklist does not in any way represent a release
or waiver of that debt.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment,
is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04221 in Executive Session on 18 Jun 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04221 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Sep 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 Nov 14,w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768
If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04029
In a letter dated 16 Jul 13, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) administratively closed the applicants case because he did not indicate how he wanted his PTDY and terminal leave dates corrected. On 7 Nov 13, the applicant resubmitted his application and provided two AF IMTs 988 and a letter from his unit indicating the change to his PTDY and terminal leave dates were due to administrative duties in his workplace. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01234
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Further, the Board notes the applicant submitted no evidence to substantiate his claim his final payment was in error with respect to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00670
On 27 Apr 12, he sent a letter stating the only document he had was the AF IMT 988, Leave Request/Authorization, for his permissive TDY and terminal leave. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial stating the governing instructions state that the member...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03927
DPSIM recommends relief for 6 days only as the 45 days the applicant requests has already been reinstated. The additional DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted copies of her Leave and Earnings Statement showing her leave balance was 63 days. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03908
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Since the applicant was married at the time of his retirement, and he elected spouse coverage, SBP monthly premiums should have been deducted beginning the first month following his retirement....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00799
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the LOR. Rather, as an administrative action, the standard of proof for an LOR (and referral OPR) is a preponderance of the evidence; i.e., that it is more likely than not that the fact occurred as...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02333
DPSFM states that the applicant began FY03 with 47 days of leave and would have accrued 17.5 days of leave by his retirement date of 30 April 2003 for a total balance of 64.5 available days of leave. Therefore the government is owed for the 5.5 days of extra leave the applicant took as part of his terminal leave. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00868
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice that warrants restoring 2.5 days of leave to the applicants records. If, at any time, the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), then...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01787 JASON C T CAMPBELL COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be released of an erroneous debt in the amount of $3,200.99 caused by a negative leave balance at the time of separation. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included...